The Painted Churches of Moldavia | A Surprising Link to the Malaccan Sultanate
Hello! As you know, I’m always looking for a story. A good photo, for me, isn't just about the 'f-stop' or the "golden hour." It’s about the story trapped inside the frame. The other day, I was idly flipping through a Slowly app, and a single screen (the one I've shared with you) stopped me in my tracks.
It showed a place called the "Churches of Moldavia" in Romania.
At first glance, they look beautiful, but ancient. Old stone, tall spires... classic Eastern European. But then you look closer. The entire outside of the churches are covered in complex paintings, called frescoes.
This isn't just a little mural over the door. We're talking about massive, detailed, floor-to-ceiling (or rather, ground-to-roof) masterpieces from the 15th and 16th centuries.
The app's description was fascinating. It called them "masterpieces inspired by Byzantine art," "authentic and particularly well preserved," and said they "represent complete cycles of religious themes." One church, Sucevița, even has a painting of the "ladder of St John Climacus."
Why would you paint the outside of a church? In a region with harsh winters? What was going on in the 1500s that made people do this?
So, I did what I always do. I fell down a historical rabbit hole. And what I found was an epic story of faith, war, and survival. But the most shocking part? This story, from a remote corner of Eastern Europe, has an almost perfect echo in our very own history, in the story of the Malaccan Sultanate.
Grab a kopi; this is a good one.
A Storybook for the Masses
First, let's understand what we're looking at. These eight churches, now a UNESCO World Heritage site, are located in the Bucovina region of northern Romania. When they were built, this area was the heart of the Principality of Moldavia.
The most famous of these is the Voroneț Monastery. It’s so famous that it has its own nickname: "the Sistine Chapel of the East." It's known for a specific, vibrant shade of blue, so unique and stable that art historians just call it "Voroneț blue."
An entire wall of the church is dedicated to a massive, breathtaking fresco of the "Last Judgment," showing the end of the world, with angels, demons, saints, and sinners.
But back to the main question: why the outside?
The answer is simple and brilliant. In the 15th and 16th centuries, most of the population the soldiers, the farmers, the villagers was illiterate. They couldn't read the Bible. So, the church leaders and the princes decided to bring the Bible to them.
These external frescoes were, quite literally, a Bible in full color.
As people gathered outside for services (as was common), they would be surrounded by these epic stories. They could see the "Ladder of St. John Climacus" at Sucevița, which shows monks climbing a ladder to heaven, with angels helping them and demons trying to pull them down.
They could see the "Last Judgment" at Voroneț and understand the consequences of a good or bad life. It was a communication tool, a massive, public and permanent piece of religious education.
But this still doesn't explain the urgency. Why create such elaborate, expensive and difficult art in such a turbulent time? For that, we need to meet the man behind the mission.
The Champion and His Fortress of Faith
The story of these churches is the story of one man: Ștefan cel Mare, or Stephen the Great.
Stephen was the voivode (prince) of Moldavia from 1457 to 1504. To call him a "national hero" is an understatement. He is the national hero of Romania and Moldova. And he lived in the most dangerous time imaginable.
Just four years before he took the throne, in 1453, the unthinkable had happened. The great Ottoman Empire, led by Mehmed the Conqueror, had captured Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire and the heart of Eastern Orthodox Christianity for a thousand years.
The Ottomans were now the dominant superpower, and they were pushing deep into Europe. Moldavia was a small, Christian principality standing right in their path.
Stephen was a brilliant military strategist and a deeply pious man. He spent his entire 47-year-reign fighting a desperate war for survival, trying to keep his kingdom independent from the Ottoman juggernaut.
He fought over 30 battles and legend says he built a church or monastery as a "thank you" to God for every single victory. These churches were his "thank you" notes.
But they were also something more. They were a powerful political and cultural statement. In a world where the Islamic Ottoman Empire seemed destined to conquer everyone, Stephen was building these vibrant, colorful, unapologetically Christian monuments.
He was telling the Ottomans, and the world, "We are here. We are Orthodox Christians. We will not be erased. Our faith is our identity." The Pope himself was so impressed by Stephen's defense of Christendom that he gave him the title Athleta Christi (Champion of Christ).
These painted monasteries, then, weren't just art. They were fortresses of faith, symbols of cultural resistance, and a public vow to God. The painting continued under his son, Petru Rareș, becoming even more elaborate, a final, beautiful act of cultural defiance even as Moldavia's independence began to wane.
A Different Ocean, The Same Struggle
Now, let's pause this story. I want you to hold that image in your mind: a small, prosperous kingdom, led by a legendary ruler, famous for its piety, suddenly facing an existential threat from a new, expansionist global empire.
Sound familiar? It should.
Let's fly halfway across the world, from the 15th-century hills of Romania to the 16th-century shores of the Malay Peninsula. What was happening right here, in our own backyard, at the exact same time?
We had our own prosperous kingdom; the Malaccan Sultanate. It wasn't a small, remote principality; it was one of the most important trading ports on Earth. A "Venice of the East" where 80 languages were spoken in the streets. Its leader was Sultan Mahmud Shah.
And just like Stephen the Great, Sultan Mahmud Shah was about to face a new, unstoppable global empire. Not the Ottomans, but the Portuguese.
Let's look at the timeline. It's chilling.
1504: Stephen the Great dies in Moldavia, his kingdom having miraculously held the line against the Ottomans for his entire life.
1509: Just five years later, a Portuguese fleet under Diogo Lopes de Sequeira sails into Malacca harbor for the first time.
1511: Afonso de Albuquerque, the Portuguese viceroy, returns with a full invasion force. After a fierce, 40-day siege, Malacca—our Malacca—falls.
The parallels are stunning. Stephen the Great was the Athleta Christi, the "Champion of Christ," defending his Orthodox kingdom from the Islamic Ottomans.
Sultan Mahmud Shah was the defender of his Islamic Sultanate, the center of Islam in the region, against the Catholic Portuguese, who had come with a mission of "Gold, Glory, and Gospel."
Both leaders were fighting for the survival of their people, their faith and their way of life against a technologically superior, expansionist power.
We have an "authentic source" for our side of the story, just as the churches are the sources for theirs. The Sejarah Melayu (The Malay Annals), our great literary masterpiece, tells the story of that final, desperate battle.
It's not a painting, but its words are just as vivid. It describes the chaos, the "cannon-balls coming like rain," and the courage of the Malaccan warriors as they fought to defend their home.
Reading about Stephen's struggle in 1475 to save his capital, Suceava, feels exactly like reading the Sejarah Melayu's account of Sultan Mahmud Shah's struggle to save his capital, Malacca, in 1511. It's the same human story, separated only by geography.
How a Story Survives
So what happened in the end? This is where the story gets even more interesting.
In Moldavia, Stephen's successors couldn't hold the line forever. Eventually, the principality had to accept Ottoman suzerainty; it became a vassal state, paying tribute to the Sultan. But here's the key; it was never fully conquered or absorbed.
And its culture? The culture that Stephen had cemented with his churches? It survived. The painting of monasteries continued, a testament to an identity that refused to die.
In Malaya, the story was different, but the theme is the same. Sultan Mahmud Shah was forced to flee Malacca. He never retook his great city. He established a new capital in exile and spent the rest of his life fighting the Portuguese.
But did the Malaccan "story" die? No.
The Sultan's descendants went on to found the great Sultanates of Johor and Perak. The culture of Malacca; its language (which became the basis for Bahasa Melayu and Indonesia), its laws, its court traditions, and its Islamic faith wasn't erased.
It simply spread, carried by the royal family and the refugees. The spirit of Malacca lived on, and in many ways, it built modern Malaysia. In both cases, the physical "kingdom" was lost or compromised. But the cultural and spiritual identity survived.
The Churches of Moldavia are the living, physical proof of that survival. They are a photo that tells a 500-year-old story. The Sejarah Melayu and the living traditions of the Malay Sultanates are our proof.
When I look at that photo of a Romanian church now, I don't just see old art. I see a universal human story. I see a reflection of our own history, our own struggles and our own incredible resilience.
The world is full of these connections, these echoes. You just have to be willing to look for them. Keep seeking the story.
Sources for the Curious:
For the history of Moldavia and Stephen the Great, a good starting point is Stephen the Great and Moldavia by V. M. Curin.
For the Malaccan side, you must read the Sejarah Melayu (The Malay Annals). You can find translated versions by C.C. Brown or John Leyden.
For a modern academic look at this period in Southeast Asia, anything by Andaya & Andaya (like A History of Malaysia) or Anthony Reid (like A History of Southeast Asia) is fantastic.
Comments